remove harmful remark from nip-10.

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/10.md b/10.md
index 6494796..9c79b4a 100644
--- a/10.md
+++ b/10.md
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Where:
 
  * `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
  * `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference.  Many clients treat this field as optional.
- 
+
 **The positions of the "e" tags within the event denote specific meanings as follows**:
 
  * No "e" tag: <br>
@@ -29,34 +29,34 @@ Where:
  `["e", <id>]`: The id of the event to which this event is a reply.
 
  * Two "e" tags:  `["e", <root-id>]`, `["e", <reply-id>]` <br>
- `<root-id>` is the id of the event at the root of the reply chain.  `<reply-id>` is the id of the article to which this event is a reply.  
+ `<root-id>` is the id of the event at the root of the reply chain.  `<reply-id>` is the id of the article to which this event is a reply.
 
  * Many "e" tags: `["e", <root-id>]` `["e", <mention-id>]`, ..., `["e", <reply-id>]`<br>
-There may be any number of `<mention-ids>`.  These are the ids of events which may, or may not be in the reply chain.  
+There may be any number of `<mention-ids>`.  These are the ids of events which may, or may not be in the reply chain.
 They are citings from this event.  `root-id` and `reply-id` are as above.
 
 >This scheme is deprecated because it creates ambiguities that are difficult, or impossible to resolve when an event references another but is not a reply.
 
 ## Marked "e" tags (PREFERRED)
-`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`  
-        
+`["e", <event-id>, <relay-url>, <marker>]`
+
 Where:
 
  * `<event-id>` is the id of the event being referenced.
  * `<relay-url>` is the URL of a recommended relay associated with the reference. Clients SHOULD add a valid `<relay-URL>` field, but may instead leave it as `""`.
  * `<marker>` is optional and if present is one of `"reply"`, `"root"`, or `"mention"`.
 
-**The order of marked "e" tags is not relevant.**  Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to.  Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
+Those marked with `"reply"` denote the id of the reply event being responded to.  Those marked with `"root"` denote the root id of the reply thread being responded to. For top level replies (those replying directly to the root event), only the `"root"` marker should be used. Those marked with `"mention"` denote a quoted or reposted event id.
 
 A direct reply to the root of a thread should have a single marked "e" tag of type "root".
 
->This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.  
+>This scheme is preferred because it allows events to mention others without confusing them with `<reply-id>` or `<root-id>`.
 
 
 ## The "p" tag
 Used in a text event contains a list of pubkeys used to record who is involved in a reply thread.
 
-When replying to a text event E the reply event's "p" tags should contain all of E's "p" tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.  
+When replying to a text event E the reply event's "p" tags should contain all of E's "p" tags as well as the `"pubkey"` of the event being replied to.
 
-Example:  Given a text event authored by `a1` with "p" tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the "p" tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`] 
+Example:  Given a text event authored by `a1` with "p" tags [`p1`, `p2`, `p3`] then the "p" tags of the reply should be [`a1`, `p1`, `p2`, `p3`]
 in no particular order.