Merge branch 'master' into vending-machine

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/22.md b/22.md
index 2172519..f595ebf 100644
--- a/22.md
+++ b/22.md
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ NIP-22
 ======
 
 Event `created_at` Limits
----------------------------
+-------------------------
 
 `draft` `optional` `author:jeffthibault` `author:Giszmo`
 
 Relays may define both upper and lower limits within which they will consider an event's `created_at` to be acceptable. Both the upper and lower limits MUST be unix timestamps in seconds as defined in [NIP-01](01.md).
 
-If a relay supports this NIP, the relay SHOULD send the client a [NIP-20](20.md) command result saying the event was not stored for the `created_at` timestamp not being within the permitted limits.
+If a relay supports this NIP, the relay SHOULD send the client an `OK` result saying the event was not stored for the `created_at` timestamp not being within the permitted limits.
 
 Client Behavior
 ---------------
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ This NIP formalizes restrictions on event timestamps as accepted by a relay and
 
 The event `created_at` field is just a unix timestamp and can be set to a time in the past or future. Relays accept and share events dated to 20 years ago or 50,000 years in the future. This NIP aims to define a way for relays that do not want to store events with *any* timestamp to set their own restrictions.
 
-[Replaceable events](16.md#replaceable-events) can behave rather unexpectedly if the user wrote them - or tried to write them - with a wrong system clock. Persisting an update with a backdated system now would result in the update not getting persisted without a notification and if they did the last update with a forward dated system, they will again fail to do another update with the now correct time.
+_Replaceable events_ can behave rather unexpectedly if the user wrote them - or tried to write them - with a wrong system clock. Persisting an update with a backdated system now would result in the update not getting persisted without a notification and if they did the last update with a forward dated system, they will again fail to do another update with the now correct time.
 
 A wide adoption of this NIP could create a better user experience as it would decrease the amount of events that appear wildly out of order or even from impossible dates in the distant past or future.