NIP-89: fix `REQ` examples

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/89.md b/89.md
index 43d197f..54aa30b 100644
--- a/89.md
+++ b/89.md
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ User B might see in their timeline an event referring to a `kind:31337` event (e
 User B's client, not knowing how to handle a `kind:31337` might display the event using its `alt` tag (as described in NIP-31). When the user clicks on the event, the application queries for a handler for this `kind`:
 
 ```json
-["REQ", <id>, '[{ "kinds": [31989], "#d": ["31337"], 'authors': [<user>, <users-contact-list>] }]']
+["REQ", <id>, { "kinds": [31989], "#d": ["31337"], "authors": [<user>, <users-contact-list>] }]
 ```
 
 User B, who follows User A, sees that `kind:31989` event and fetches the `a`-tagged event for the app and handler information.
@@ -127,5 +127,5 @@ User B's client sees the application's `kind:31990` which includes the informati
 Alternatively, users might choose to query directly for `kind:31990` for an event kind. Clients SHOULD be careful doing this and use spam-prevention mechanisms or querying high-quality restricted relays to avoid directing users to malicious handlers.
 
 ```json
-["REQ", <id>, '[{ "kinds": [31990], "#k": [<desired-event-kind>], 'authors': [...] }]']
+["REQ", <id>, { "kinds": [31990], "#k": [<desired-event-kind>], "authors": [...] }]
 ```