1 files changed, 0 insertions, 487 deletions

diff --git a/docs/archive/2025-11-04-evening/session-summary.md b/docs/archive/2025-11-04-evening/session-summary.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 398f4d0..0000000
--- a/docs/archive/2025-11-04-evening/session-summary.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,487 +0,0 @@
-# Session Summary - GRASP Protocol Review
-
-**Date:** November 4, 2025  
-**Duration:** ~2 hours  
-**Status:** ✅ Complete - Ready for implementation
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Session Goals
-
-1. ✅ Review GRASP protocol specification
-2. ✅ Review ngit-relay reference implementation
-3. ✅ Understand architecture requirements
-4. ✅ Update work documents with accurate plan
-5. ✅ Fix mistakes in previous understanding
-
----
-
-## 🔍 Key Discoveries
-
-### 1. Single Port Architecture (CRITICAL!)
-
-**Previous Understanding (WRONG):**
-- Nostr relay on port 8080
-- Git server on port 8081
-- Separate services
-
-**Correct Understanding:**
-- **BOTH services on SAME port** (e.g., 8080)
-- HTTP router splits traffic by path:
-  - `/<npub>/<id>.git` → Git handler
-  - `/` → Nostr relay (WebSocket)
-- This is a GRASP-01 requirement!
-
-**Evidence:**
-- `../ngit-relay/docker-compose.yml` - Single port (8081)
-- `../ngit-relay/src/nginx.conf` - nginx routes by path on one listener
-
-**Impact:**
-- Complete architecture redesign needed
-- Must use actix-web for HTTP routing
-- All previous assumptions about ports were wrong
-
----
-
-### 2. Test Requirements Must Map to Protocol
-
-**Discovery:** Tests must reference GRASP protocol line numbers.
-
-**Example:**
-```rust
-#[tokio::test]
-async fn test_git_http_basic() {
-    // Reference: ../grasp/01.md line 15
-    // MUST serve git repository via unauthenticated git smart http service
-    // at /<npub>/<identifier>.git
-    
-    // Test implementation...
-}
-```
-
-**Why:**
-- Makes tests traceable to requirements
-- Easy to verify compliance
-- Documents what we're testing
-- Helps reviewers understand intent
-
-**Action:**
-- Update all test files with protocol references
-- Create new tests for missing requirements
-- Organize tests by GRASP-01 sections
-
----
-
-### 3. Environment Variables
-
-**Discovery:** ngit-relay uses specific env var naming we should match.
-
-**Critical Variables:**
-- `NGIT_DOMAIN` - Used for announcement validation (REQUIRED)
-- `NGIT_BIND_ADDRESS` - Single port for all services (REQUIRED)
-- `NGIT_GIT_DATA_PATH` - Where to store Git repos (REQUIRED)
-- `NGIT_RELAY_DATA_PATH` - Where to store events (REQUIRED)
-
-**Our .env.example:**
-- ✅ Already has all required fields
-- ✅ Follows ngit-relay naming convention
-- ✅ No changes needed
-
----
-
-### 4. NIP-11 GRASP Fields
-
-**Discovery:** NIP-11 must include GRASP-specific fields.
-
-**Required Fields:**
-```json
-{
-  "supported_grasps": ["GRASP-01"],
-  "repo_acceptance_criteria": "Must list service in clone and relays tags",
-  "curation": "Basic spam prevention"  // optional
-}
-```
-
-**Action:**
-- Add fields to NIP-11 response
-- Update tests to verify fields
-- Document in code
-
----
-
-### 5. Repository Path Structure
-
-**Discovery:** Repos follow specific path pattern.
-
-**Pattern:** `{GIT_DATA_PATH}/{npub}/{identifier}.git`
-
-**Example:**
-```
-./data/repos/
-├── npub1abc.../
-│   └── my-project.git/
-└── npub1xyz.../
-    └── their-repo.git/
-```
-
-**Action:**
-- Create directory structure on repo provision
-- Initialize bare repositories
-- Handle cleanup on deletion
-
----
-
-### 6. CORS Requirements
-
-**Discovery:** CORS must be on ALL responses, not optional.
-
-**Requirements (GRASP-01 lines 32-40):**
-1. `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` on ALL responses
-2. `Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST` on ALL responses
-3. `Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type` on ALL responses
-4. Respond to OPTIONS with 204 No Content
-
-**Implementation:**
-- Use actix-cors middleware
-- Apply to all routes
-- Test with browser
-
----
-
-### 7. Announcement Validation
-
-**Discovery:** Must validate announcements list this service.
-
-**Rule (GRASP-01 lines 3-5):**
-> MUST reject announcements that do not list the service in both 
-> `clone` and `relays` tags unless implementing GRASP-05.
-
-**Validation Logic:**
-```rust
-fn validate_announcement(event: &Event, domain: &str) -> Result<()> {
-    let has_clone = event.tags.iter().any(|tag| 
-        tag.is_clone() && tag.content().contains(domain)
-    );
-    let has_relay = event.tags.iter().any(|tag|
-        tag.is_relay() && tag.content().contains(domain)
-    );
-    
-    if !has_clone || !has_relay {
-        return Err("Must list service in clone and relays");
-    }
-    Ok(())
-}
-```
-
-**Action:**
-- Implement validation in event handler
-- Reject invalid announcements
-- Add tests
-
----
-
-## 📄 Documents Created
-
-### 1. work/current_status.md
-**Purpose:** Comprehensive status of implementation
-
-**Contents:**
-- GRASP-01 requirements checklist
-- Architecture understanding
-- Current implementation status
-- Known issues
-- Next priorities
-- Key references
-
-**Use:** Reference for overall project status
-
----
-
-### 2. work/NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md
-**Purpose:** Step-by-step implementation guide
-
-**Contents:**
-- Immediate goal (actix-web integration)
-- Critical architecture understanding
-- 8-step implementation plan with code examples
-- Verification steps
-- Common issues & solutions
-- Success criteria
-
-**Use:** Start here next session for implementation
-
----
-
-### 3. work/review-summary.md
-**Purpose:** Document findings from GRASP/ngit-relay review
-
-**Contents:**
-- 10 critical discoveries
-- Evidence for each
-- Action items
-- Compliance status
-- Next steps
-
-**Use:** Reference for why we're making changes
-
----
-
-### 4. work/architecture-diagram.md
-**Purpose:** Visual reference for architecture
-
-**Contents:**
-- Current vs. target architecture diagrams
-- Request flow examples
-- Component responsibilities
-- File structure
-- Comparison with ngit-relay
-
-**Use:** Visual reference during implementation
-
----
-
-### 5. work/implementation-checklist.md
-**Purpose:** Detailed checklist for implementation
-
-**Contents:**
-- 5 phases with detailed tasks
-- Verification steps for each task
-- Manual testing procedures
-- Automated testing commands
-- Acceptance criteria
-- Known issues to watch for
-- Reference commands
-
-**Use:** Track progress during implementation
-
----
-
-### 6. work/session-summary.md (this file)
-**Purpose:** Summary of this review session
-
-**Contents:**
-- What we accomplished
-- Key discoveries
-- Documents created
-- Next steps
-
-**Use:** Remember what we did this session
-
----
-
-## 📊 Compliance Status
-
-### Before This Session
-- **Understanding:** Incorrect (separate ports)
-- **NIP-01:** ~60% (relay works)
-- **NIP-34:** ~20% (basic storage)
-- **GRASP-01:** ~10% (wrong architecture)
-
-### After This Session
-- **Understanding:** ✅ Correct (single port, routing)
-- **NIP-01:** ~60% (no change, but plan to improve)
-- **NIP-34:** ~20% (no change, but plan ready)
-- **GRASP-01:** ~20% (plan ready, architecture understood)
-
-### Target After Next Session
-- **Understanding:** ✅ Complete
-- **NIP-01:** ~80% (with actix-web)
-- **NIP-34:** ~40% (with announcement validation)
-- **GRASP-01:** ~60% (with Git HTTP working)
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Next Session Plan
-
-### Immediate Goal
-**Integrate actix-web for single-port HTTP/WebSocket/Git routing**
-
-### Steps (from NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md)
-1. Add dependencies (actix-web, actix-cors, actix-ws, git-http-backend)
-2. Create src/http/mod.rs (HTTP server)
-3. Create src/http/git.rs (Git handler)
-4. Create src/http/nostr.rs (WebSocket handler)
-5. Update src/main.rs
-6. Update tests
-7. Manual testing
-8. Automated testing
-
-### Success Criteria
-- ✅ Server starts on single port
-- ✅ WebSocket connects at `/`
-- ✅ NIP-01 smoke tests pass
-- ✅ Can clone Git repo
-- ✅ CORS headers present
-- ✅ All tests pass
-
-### Estimated Time
-2-4 hours for core implementation  
-1-2 hours for testing and debugging  
-**Total: 3-6 hours**
-
----
-
-## 📚 Key References for Next Session
-
-### Must Read Before Starting
-1. `work/NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md` - Implementation guide
-2. `work/architecture-diagram.md` - Visual reference
-3. `../grasp/01.md` - THE SPEC (lines 1-40)
-4. `../ngit-relay/src/nginx.conf` - Routing pattern
-
-### Reference During Implementation
-1. `work/implementation-checklist.md` - Track progress
-2. `work/current_status.md` - Overall context
-3. [actix-web docs](https://actix.rs/docs/) - Framework reference
-4. [git-http-backend docs](https://docs.rs/git-http-backend/) - Git protocol
-
-### Reference for Testing
-1. `tests/common/relay.rs` - TestRelay fixture
-2. `grasp-audit/src/specs/nip01_smoke.rs` - Test specs
-3. `work/implementation-checklist.md` - Testing procedures
-
----
-
-## ✅ Accomplishments
-
-### Understanding
-- ✅ Fully understand GRASP-01 requirements
-- ✅ Understand ngit-relay architecture
-- ✅ Identified critical mistake (separate ports)
-- ✅ Understand how to fix it (actix-web routing)
-
-### Documentation
-- ✅ Created comprehensive status document
-- ✅ Created step-by-step implementation guide
-- ✅ Created architecture diagrams
-- ✅ Created detailed checklist
-- ✅ Created review summary
-- ✅ Created session summary
-
-### Planning
-- ✅ Detailed 8-step implementation plan
-- ✅ Identified all required changes
-- ✅ Created acceptance criteria
-- ✅ Prepared verification steps
-- ✅ Listed common issues to watch for
-
-### Preparation
-- ✅ Verified .env.example is correct
-- ✅ Verified TestRelay is correct
-- ✅ Identified which files need changes
-- ✅ Created code templates for new files
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Ready for Implementation
-
-### What's Ready
-- ✅ Complete understanding of requirements
-- ✅ Detailed implementation plan
-- ✅ Code templates prepared
-- ✅ Test strategy defined
-- ✅ Verification procedures documented
-
-### What's Needed
-- [ ] Time to implement (~4 hours)
-- [ ] Focus for coding
-- [ ] Testing as we go
-- [ ] Patience for debugging
-
-### Confidence Level
-**HIGH** - We have:
-- Clear understanding of problem
-- Detailed solution plan
-- Reference implementation to follow
-- Good test coverage strategy
-- Comprehensive documentation
-
----
-
-## 💡 Key Insights
-
-### 1. Architecture Matters
-The single-port architecture is not just a detail - it's fundamental to GRASP-01 compliance. Getting this wrong means the whole implementation is wrong.
-
-### 2. Reference Implementation is Gold
-ngit-relay's nginx.conf showed us EXACTLY how to route traffic. We don't need to guess - we can copy the pattern.
-
-### 3. Tests Must Map to Spec
-Having tests that reference protocol line numbers makes verification trivial. We can see exactly which requirements we've met.
-
-### 4. Documentation Saves Time
-Taking time to document our understanding and plan saves hours of confused implementation. We know exactly what to do.
-
-### 5. Incremental Progress
-We can implement in phases:
-1. HTTP routing (this phase)
-2. Repository provisioning
-3. Push authorization
-4. Full compliance
-
-Each phase is testable and valuable on its own.
-
----
-
-## 🎓 Lessons Learned
-
-### What Went Well
-- Thorough review of GRASP protocol
-- Found critical architecture issue early
-- Created comprehensive documentation
-- Have clear path forward
-
-### What Could Be Better
-- Could have reviewed GRASP spec earlier
-- Could have checked ngit-relay architecture first
-- Could have validated assumptions sooner
-
-### For Next Time
-- Always check reference implementation first
-- Read the spec thoroughly before coding
-- Validate architecture assumptions early
-- Document understanding before implementing
-
----
-
-## 📝 Notes for Future
-
-### When to Revisit This
-- Before starting implementation (read NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md)
-- When confused about architecture (read architecture-diagram.md)
-- When stuck on a requirement (read review-summary.md)
-- When tracking progress (read implementation-checklist.md)
-
-### What to Archive Later
-- This session-summary.md → docs/archive/2025-11-04-grasp-review.md
-- implementation-checklist.md → Delete after implementation complete
-- NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md → Update for next phase
-
-### What to Keep
-- current_status.md → Update as we progress
-- architecture-diagram.md → Reference documentation
-- review-summary.md → Reference for decisions
-
----
-
-## ✨ Final Thoughts
-
-This session was highly productive. We:
-1. Identified a critical architectural flaw
-2. Fully understood the correct architecture
-3. Created a detailed implementation plan
-4. Prepared everything needed for next session
-
-**We're ready to build this right.**
-
-The next session will be focused implementation - we have everything we need to succeed.
-
----
-
-**Session End:** November 4, 2025  
-**Next Session:** Implementation of actix-web integration  
-**Confidence:** HIGH ✅
-
----
-
-**Remember:** Start with `work/NEXT_SESSION_START_HERE.md`